Advisory Guidelines for Spousal Maintenance in Parker, CO
How Colorado Addresses Spousal Maintenance (Alimony)
Colorado legislators have responded to the national alimony reform movement.
Alimony, referred to in Colorado as spousal maintenance, is the payment of monetary support from one spouse to the other after a divorce or legal separation. Spousal maintenance can have a serious impact on the future lifestyle and financial health of either party after a divorce. Therefore, it is extremely important for courts to properly analyze and determine whether maintenance should be awarded and, if so, in what amount and for how long.
It is important, too, for individuals engaged in spousal support matters to work closely with an attorney. Simply put, a knowledgeable and experienced lawyer can ensure that your interests are asserted — and your rights protected — at every step. To learn more, reach out to the legal team at Fuller & Ahern, P.C. We’ve helped countless individuals in Parker and throughout the Denver metro area resolve their spousal maintenance matters. We’re uniquely positioned to help you, too.
A Brief History Of Colorado’s Spousal Support Guidelines
In 2013, concerned by an increasing trend in inconsistent maintenance awards among the state’s district courts, the Colorado Legislature enacted advisory maintenance guidelines to promote more consistency, fairness and equity statewide in maintenance awards.
The advisory guidelines, as detailed more fully below, instruct courts to take into account both the length of the marriage as well as the combined incomes of the parties when endeavoring to determine a potential maintenance award.
However, the advisory guideline amount is only a starting point for a court when determining whether a maintenance award is appropriate, what the amount of such an award should be and the duration, or term, of the award.
Stated another way, the guideline amount does not create a presumptive amount or term of maintenance that must be adopted by the court. Rather, when determining whether maintenance is appropriate or calculating the amount to award, a judge in Colorado still retains the ultimate discretion to determine whether an award of maintenance and the amount of such an award is “fair and equitable” under the unique factual circumstances of each case and/or whether it is appropriate to deviate up or down from the guideline amount.
It is worth noting, however, that one factor not considered by courts in Colorado is marital misconduct, as Colorado is a “no-fault” state, nor does it matter which party initiated the divorce proceedings.
“I knew his actions were in my best interest at all times.”I was confused, scared and grieving. I sat down to interview a lawyer named BRIAN CLOSE, at Susan Fuller & Assoc. I instantly felt the professionalism and knowledge this man had in many aspects of law. Divorce, civil, common law and more. I want to say the comfort I felt by placing my case in his hands was an overwhelming relief as I moved through a very challenging divorce and civil suit. I was challenged at every angle. Brian never made me feel intimidated nor insecure in decisions I had to make. Brian Close always took the time to explain my case and covered every angle. At times I just wanted to give up and give in. He took the time to make sure I understood everything that I didn't understand. I knew his actions were in my best interest at all times. With that, I hung in there and the day my cases were settled, I was overwhelmed with relief and success. This was a direct result from working with such a professional. The entire firm welcomed me and I can't say enough about everyone at the firm who conferred on my case. Right down to the paralegals and front office. Thank you for making this chapter of my life safe and secure under your direction.- Tami P.
“I could write a book waxing on about his expertise, and professional and kind demeanor.”- Carol A.
Great legal services were provided to my daughter and I during her dissolution of marriage, and a couple of related matters after that. Our Attorney, Brian Close, was fantastic! I could write a book waxing on about his expertise, and professional and kind demeanor. The office's supporting staff were always professional and helpful as well. It feels like the office works together to provide the help and legal support needed during difficult times. I am extremely grateful that we were able to be represented by Brian Close of Fuller & Ahern, P.C.!
“James is very calm and wants his clients to feel at ease by providing expectations ahead of time.”I definitely recommend the Fuller & Ahern law firm. From the beginning, James worked very hard to ensure my side was heard by the district attorney. He worked behind the scenes to help navigate me out of the criminal system. It is evident he has a lot of experience and is very smart. Facing any type of criminal charges is very scary and life-changing. Going to the courtroom can be daunting. James is very calm and wants his clients to feel at ease by providing expectations ahead of time. He assesses the situation and continuously works to ensure his clients get the best deal possible. Clients shouldn't expect a lot of face-to-face time but should be confident he is doing his job. I am so thankful for his help, expertise, and willingness to quickly take on my case.- Lauren L.
“James was a true professional while keeping a personal touch.”I reached out to James Ahern at Fuller & Ahern, P.C. for legal trouble I was involved in. I was inexperienced and needed direction. Once James became involved, he guided me through the legal proceedings and gave me advice and possible outcomes throughout our work together. James was a true professional while keeping a personal touch. I would highly recommend James to anyone going through legal troubles.- Mark M.
“I am very grateful for his dedication and care with my case.”“So thankful I found this amazing law office! Brian Close is off-the-charts intelligent, I would actually say he is a genius at what he does.”- Mary A.
Guidance For State Judges
If maintenance is requested by a party in a divorce proceeding, the Colorado maintenance statute requires the judge to engage in a complex and lengthy analysis aimed at determining whether the party seeking maintenance actually requires it and whether the party from whom maintenance is sought can afford to provide the maintenance in the amount and duration requested.
First, a judge in Colorado must determine:
- Each party’s gross income
- How the marital property will be divided
- Each party’s financial resources (including income from marital and/or separate property)
- The reasonable financial need of the party requesting maintenance
Second, a judge determines whether maintenance is appropriate and what amount and term would be fair and equitable by considering:
- The guideline amount and term (if the guidelines apply to the marriage)
- All relevant factors, including 12 factors enumerated in the statute itself (such as financial resources, marital lifestyle, property division, length of marriage, age and health of the parties, and several others)
- If the potential recipient lacks sufficient property to provide for his or her needs and is unable to support him/herself through appropriate employment (or because child custody responsibility would make employment inappropriate)
A member of our team will be in touch shortly to confirm your contact details or address questions you may have.
The Advisory Guideline Calculation
If maintenance is awarded after the court has addressed the foundational issues above, the court will look to the advisory guidelines if two things are true:
- The parties were married for at least three years.
- The parties’ combined annual adjusted gross income is below $240,000.
The new guidelines enacted by the Legislature are based upon a complex formula for courts to use when calculating the guideline amount of a maintenance award.
The formula for calculating the guideline amount of an award asks judges to calculate 40 percent of the higher earning party’s monthly adjusted gross income and subtract from that 50 percent of the lower earning party’s monthly adjusted gross income. The difference will be the guideline amount, unless this amount, when added to the recipient’s gross income, is more than 40 percent of the parties’ combined monthly adjusted gross income.
Unlike the amount of maintenance, the guideline duration of a maintenance award, or term, is set out in a table in the statute itself. The table includes marriages ranging from three years to 20 years. The table calculates a term by applying a different percentage value to different marriage durations. For example, the guideline term of maintenance for a three-year (36-month) marriage would be 11 months (after the guideline percentage applicable to a three-year marriage, or 31 percent, is applied) (36 times .31).
If a marital term is less than three years or over 20, the term will not be assigned a percentage or addressed in the table specifically, but there is guidance provided to courts under the guidelines for how to determine whether maintenance is appropriate for marriages under three years and over 20 years.
Again, however, the guideline amount and term of spousal maintenance are simply guidelines for the court to look to. The court may order amounts and/or terms above or below the guidelines, within its discretion.